Reviews You Can Rely On

Bissell AirRam Review

This middle-of-the-road vacuum performed well in our tests and would be a good value pick if you can find it on sale
gearlab tested logo
bissell airram stick vacuum review
The Bissell AirRam
Credit: Bissell
Price:  $268 List
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Manufacturer:   BISSELL
By David Wise and Austin Palmer  ⋅  Jan 12, 2022
60
OVERALL
SCORE


RANKED
#9 of 12
  • Convenience - 35% 5.5
  • Hard Surface Cleaning - 30% 6.3
  • Ease of Use - 20% 7.0
  • Carpet Cleaning - 15% 5.4

Our Verdict

On the whole, the Bissell AirRam did very well in our tests for the best stick vacuum, scoring above-average in most of our metrics. It is very easy and convenient to use, didn't disappoint in our cleaning tests, and has an impressively long battery life. It also does a great job at cleaning under furniture, though it is on the heavy side. However, no aspect of its performance was quite enough to merit an award, and there are definitely other vacuums out there that we would more readily recommend.
REASONS TO BUY
Very easy to use
Solid performance on hard floors
Battery lasts a long time
REASONS TO AVOID
A little pricey
Heavy
Editor's Note: The AirRam review, updated January 11, 2022, now has details concerning which products we would recommend to a friend who might be considering this product.

Compare to Similar Products

 
bissell airram stick vacuum review
This Product
Bissell AirRam
Awards  Best Buy Award    
Price $268 List
$267.79 at Amazon
$170 List
$129.97 at Amazon
$150 List$34 List
$33.98 at Amazon
$35 List
$41.90 at Amazon
Overall Score Sort Icon
60
66
62
39
39
Star Rating
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bottom Line This cordless stick vacuum scored quite well in our tests, but doesn't quite have the performance or value to win an awardThis inexpensive vacuum is convenient and well-priced but only average overallThe advantages of this vacuum are numerous, but the drawbacks of subpar cleaning performance on typical surfaces outweigh those benefitsA budget vacuum with distinct limitations across all metricsThis vacuum definitely wasn't our favorite, with its main merit being its exceptionally low price and not much else
Rating Categories Bissell AirRam Eureka RapidClean Pro Black+Decker Powers... Bissell Featherweight Dirt Devil Simpli-Stik
Convenience (35%)
5.5
7.5
6.4
3.0
3.1
Hard Surface Cleaning (30%)
6.3
6.5
4.5
4.8
4.0
Ease of Use (20%)
7.0
6.4
8.0
4.0
5.8
Carpet Cleaning (15%)
5.4
4.9
6.5
4.0
2.7
Specs Bissell AirRam Eureka RapidClean Pro Black+Decker Powers... Bissell Featherweight Dirt Devil Simpli-Stik
Weight 8.1 lbs 5.1 lbs 5.8 lbs 2.9 lbs 3.4 lbs
Cordless Battery Life 34 min 52 sec 23 min 12 sec Boost: 16 min 36 sec
Auto: 24 min 50 sec
n/a n/a
Measured Charge Time 3 hours 20 min 4 hours 30 min 4 hours 45 min n/a n/a
Noise Level 74 dBa 65 dBa 80 dBa 78 dBa 74 dBa
Model Number 1984 NEC180 BHFEA520J 2033 SD20000RED
Measured Head Width 10.75" 9.75" 9.88" 8" 9"
Variable Suction Control No Yes Yes Yes No
Brush On/Off Switch? No No No Yes n/a
Storage Stands up; retractable handle Wall mount only Stands up; wall mount Stands up Stands up; falls over easily
Swivel Head? Yes Yes Yes No No
Soft Bumper? No Yes No No No
Cordless? Yes Yes Yes No No
Maximum Corded Reach n/a n/a n/a 15 ft 17.5 ft

Our Analysis and Test Results

The Bissell AirRam is good but not great, and its price point is inching toward too high for the performance level. It would be a great vacuum if its price were reduced to compete with other budget-minded models, but there are definitely better top-ranked stick vacuum alternatives on the market for now.

Performance Comparison


bissell airram stick vacuum review - the airram by bissell.
The AirRam by Bissell.
Credit: Jenna Ammerman

Convenience


The entire point of a stick vacuum is to provide a more convenient option than vacuum cleaners with a more traditional design. Because of this, our convenience metric accounts for the largest portion of the overall score at 35%. We based the score for each product on how well it could clean other parts of the home besides the floor, how much it weighed, whether or not it was corded or cordless — and correspondingly, its maximum reach or battery life — and how convenient it is to store each vacuum. The AirRam gave a solid showing in this category.

bissell airram stick vacuum review - the airram is decently convenient.
The AirRam is decently convenient.
Credit: Jenna Ammerman

The AirRam is restricted to vacuuming floors, hurting its score slightly. While other models can transform into a handheld vacuum, this one lacks any transformative abilities. It is also a little on the heavier side, costing it a few more additional points. However, it is stable enough to stand on its own, and the handle retracts to make it even more convenient to store.

bissell airram stick vacuum review - the retractable handle makes it easy to store this vacuum.
The retractable handle makes it easy to store this vacuum.
Credit: Jenna Ammerman

This cordless stick vacuum distinguished itself by having an exceptional battery life, lasting for a total of 35 minutes before calling it quits in our tests. It also charges relatively quickly, only taking about 3 hours and 20 minutes to top off the battery completely. These stats are among the best in our entire lineup.

Hard Surface Cleaning


Next, we assessed how well the AirRam cleaned hard flooring. To do this, we spread out rice, flour, cereal, oatmeal, and pet hair on a section of laminate wood floor, then evaluated how well everything was picked up. The AirRam started with a rather unimpressive performance in our rice test, flinging a non-trivial amount of rice about the room as it cleaned. However, it did a much better job at collecting flour, only taking two passes to get all of the flour — even stuff between the cracks in the boards, an area that many vacuums miss. The strong performance continued in our pet hair and cereal collection challenges, with the AirRam sucking up all of the debris without any sign of a struggle. This metric finished out with a solid performance at collecting oats, though some inadvertently got flung across the room.

bissell airram stick vacuum review - the airram excelled at cleaning flour from hard floors.
The AirRam excelled at cleaning flour from hard floors.
Credit: Austin Palmer

Ease of Use


This metric, worth 20% of the total score, ranked each vacuum on how easy it is to use, focusing on its noise level and cleaning options and how well each product cleaned close to the edges of a room and under furniture. The AirRam scored very well here.

bissell airram stick vacuum review - it is very easy to use the airram.
It is very easy to use the AirRam.
Credit: Jenna Ammerman

This vacuum did an average job cleaning along the wall, leaving some debris along the edge and in front of the vacuum.

bissell airram stick vacuum review - this product collected most of the debris when cleaning along an...
This product collected most of the debris when cleaning along an edge, but did leave some behind.
Credit: Austin Palmer

The AirRam also did exceptionally well at cleaning under furniture, satisfactorily cleaning under our simulated sofa in its entirety, reaching over 37 inches. Very impressive.

bissell airram stick vacuum review - it is very easy to clean under furniture with this vacuum.
It is very easy to clean under furniture with this vacuum.
Credit: Austin Palmer

This vacuum has swivel steering, though it isn't the most agile when it comes to maneuvering. Additionally, it only has a single cleaning mode, with no option to adjust it for different floor types.

bissell airram stick vacuum review - the swivel steering on this product is quite good, but it is...
The swivel steering on this product is quite good, but it is definitely inferior to a couple of other models that scored higher.
Credit: Jenna Ammerman

Carpet Cleaning


Accounting for the remaining 15% of the total score, this metric assessed each vacuum at how well it could keep soft floors sparkling. We again used rice, oats, flour, cereal, and pet hair, this time testing on both low-pile flat carpet and medium-pile fluffy carpet.

The AirRam had a similar problem to the hard floor metric when collecting rice from a flat carpet, flinging some of it around. However, it did much better on fluffier carpet, collecting all of the rice without issue.

bissell airram stick vacuum review - the bissell got most of the rice, but did fling some out of view of...
The Bissell got most of the rice, but did fling some out of view of the photo while cleaning.
Credit: Austin Palmer

The AirRam didn't particularly impress us at collecting flour, leaving behind a decent amount. However, it redeemed itself by doing an excellent job at collecting Cheerios, requiring minimal effort on both flat and fluffy carpets, with no noticeable residue. It sucked up oats quite well also, only launching a few flakes across the room. However, this vacuum delivered a poor performance at picking up pet hair, leaving tons behind on the carpet. This performance will undoubtedly be a deal-breaker if you have pets, and you should probably consider an alternative product.

Should You Buy the AirRam?


Possibly. This vacuum offers solid performance in most metrics but is somewhat pricey for what you get. We suspect if you can find it on sale, it could be a good choice. However, with the premium price, we think there are better-performing options in this review. Depending on your goals, we can see this vacuum being a potential option if the price is right.

What Other Stick Vacuum Should You Consider?


Most of the competition is either far more expensive than this vacuum or significantly cheaper. This puts it in a weird position if you are primarily driven by budget. If your budget is small, we like the Eureka RapidClean. We like the Shark Rocket Pet Pro if budget is less of a concern. This vacuum earned one of the highest overall scores n the group, with a high for convenience and better than average cleaning prowess for both flat and carpeted surfaces.

David Wise and Austin Palmer